Is this for you?
- Your team knows each core tool by name, but the FMEA, control plan, MSA and SPC don't talk to each other.
- New engineers need the whole picture quickly.
- A customer or auditor has raised findings on more than one core tool.
Who should attend
Quality, process and product engineers, launch team members and supervisors. The awareness course also suits managers who need to know what to ask for.
The order of the topics
- APQP: the launch plan, and where PPAP fits at the end
- FMEA: design first, then process
- Control plan: built from the process FMEA
- MSA: can we trust the gauges named in the control plan?
- SPC: is the process stable and capable?
- PPAP: the evidence, put together from the week's work
What participants practise
Choose the format
| Format | For | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness (2 days) | Everyone in the launch team, managers | Day 1: APQP, FMEA, control plan. Day 2: MSA, SPC, PPAP |
| Practitioner (5 days) | Engineers | All six tools in the same order, with hands-on exercises for each |
Each day is about 8 hours, with lunch and two tea breaks. Reviewing your own FMEA and control plan on your floor is a full review, done as consulting: see the FMEA & Control Plan Review.
What changes afterwards
Your team sees the core tools as one chain, not six separate files: a change in the FMEA shows up in the control plan, the gauges and the charts.
Questions people ask
Which references do you follow?
The AIAG APQP, PPAP, Control Plan, MSA and SPC manuals and the AIAG-VDA FMEA handbook, plus your customers' specific requirements. Please use licensed copies; Kattamaipu is independent and not affiliated with AIAG or VDA.
Can we take just one tool?
Yes. Each tool is also a course of its own: see the SPC, MSA, FMEA, control plan and APQP and PPAP pages.